/[suikacvs]/webroot/www/2004/id/draft-mutz-http-attributes-02.txt
Suika

Contents of /webroot/www/2004/id/draft-mutz-http-attributes-02.txt

Parent Directory Parent Directory | Revision Log Revision Log


Revision 1.1 - (show annotations) (download)
Tue Jun 15 08:37:16 2004 UTC (20 years, 10 months ago) by wakaba
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: HEAD
File MIME type: text/plain
Error occurred while calculating annotation data.
New

1
2 HTTP Working Group A. Mutz, Hewlett-Packard
3 INTERNET-DRAFT L. Montulli, Netscape
4 <draft-mutz-http-attributes-02.txt> L. Masinter, Xerox
5 K. Holtman, TUE
6 Expires May 26, 1997 Nov 26, 1996
7
8 User-Agent Display Attributes
9
10 STATUS OF THIS MEMO
11 This document is an Internet-Draft. Internet-Drafts are working
12 documents of the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), its
13 areas, and its working groups. Note that other groups may also
14 distribute working documents as Internet-Drafts. Internet-Drafts
15 are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months and may be
16 updated, replaced, or made obsolete by other documents at any
17 time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
18 material or to cite them other than as "work in progress". To
19 learn the current status of any Internet-Draft, please check the
20 "1id-abstracts.txt" listing contained in the Internet-Drafts
21 Shadow Directories on ftp.is.co.za (Africa), nic.nordu.net
22 (Europe), munnari.oz.au (Pacific Rim), ds.internic.net (US East
23 Coast), or ftp.isi.edu (US West Coast).
24
25 Distribution of this document is unlimited. Please send comments
26 to the HTTP working group at <http-wg@cuckoo.hpl.hp.com>.
27 Discussions of the working group are archived at
28 <URL:http://www.ics.uci.edu/pub/ietf/http/>. General discussions
29 about HTTP and the applications which use HTTP should take place
30 on the <www- talk@w3.org> mailing list.
31
32 THIS DRAFT IS FOR DISCUSSION PURPOSES ONLY AND SHOULD NOT BE RELEASED
33 IN ANY PRODUCTION SOFTWARE.
34
35 ABSTRACT
36 User-Agent Display Attributes Headers provide a means for an HTTP
37 client [3] and server to negotiate for content dependent on the
38 client display capabilities. This memo describes feature tags for
39 introducing this information into an HTTP transmission. The
40 intent is to present resource variants when available [5] such
41 that a capable server may present documents in a preferred form to
42 a client. If such a preferred form is not available, the server
43 should still provide the requested documents.
44
45 This specification is intended as an extension to HTTP/1.1 [4], to
46 be implemented using the negotiation mechanism, transparent
47 content negotiation [5].
48
49 INTRODUCTION
50
51 Purpose
52
53 The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) is protocol for distributed,
54 collaborative, hypermedia information systems. At present the
55 server relies on the client's ability to present visual information
56 in a usable fashion without information about the client's display
57 characteristics. The presence of large images, video, and other
58 visual information in HTML documents has strained this model. HTML
59 documents suitable for a certain video monitor size are often less
60 usable on displays of much smaller or larger resolution, such as
61 PDA's and high-resolution printers.
62
63 This specification defines feature tags [5] in the context of
64 transparent content negotiation, an extension to the
65 protocol referred to as HTTP. These tags enable a client to inform
66 a server regarding its display capabilities. The server may then
67 provide the variant of the resource more suitable for the display.
68 Different variants would typically be higher or lower
69 resolution images (for example) as appropriate. In the case of a
70 printer client, the result would be higher quality output. In the
71 case of a PDA, the result would be faster transmission.
72 The presence of these tags may cause a request to return a reply
73 requiring the client to choose from a list of variants, but must
74 not cause a request to be failed due to lack of the proper variant.
75
76 Operation
77
78 The details of feature negotiation are described elsewhere [5].
79
80 When a server receives an HTTP request including user-attrib feature
81 tags, it may use this information to return a variant of a resource
82 most appropriate for the client's display (along with a list of the
83 available variants.) The variants are expected to differ primarily
84 in image size and color content, but other variations such as
85 shorter text descriptions are also foreseeable. The number of
86 variants should be limited to provide efficient caching since the
87 number of variants could become very large. Operation of feature
88 negotiation when a resource has a very long list of variants is
89 under discussion.
90
91 UA-attrib tags can indicate display dimensions (in pixels), display
92 resolution (in pixels/inch), color capability and bit-depth, and
93 display media type. The physical dimensions of the display can be
94 inferred from the display size and display resolution. In the case
95 of paper output, the paper size may be expressed as a token from a
96 list of certain standard paper sizes. These are presented
97 formally in the Notation section.
98
99 The headers and arguments are case-insensitive. The syntax is presented
100 in terms of the Accept-Features header proposed in [5] for historical
101 reasons.
102
103 USER-AGENT ATTRIBUTE FEATURE TAGS:
104
105 pix-x<=n
106 pix-y<=m
107
108 The maximum display size of the client's device (or window)is transmitted
109 in total horizontal, n, and vertical, m, pixel number, for example: pix-
110 x<=1024, pix-y<=768. The intent is to present and allow the
111 selection of the resource variants best suited to a client's device.
112 This display size may conform to either the device display or the
113 size of the client window depending on application.
114
115 res<=n
116
117 The display device maximum resolution is transmitted in pixels per inch.
118 For example: res<=72. Certain resources such as images may have
119 similar total pixel size but differing data size and quality
120 depending on degree of compression. UA-res can be used to resolve a
121 preferred image in this case.
122
123 The authors recognize English units are not universal, but desire to
124 avoid multiple unit definitions.
125
126 UA-media=token
127
128 The display device media is indicated with an ASCII token. Basic
129 token values are: screen, stationary, transparency, envelope, or
130 continuous-long. Other values may be defined. Except for `screen',
131 these tokens are a subset of the Printer MIB MediaType set defined
132 in RFC-1759 [6]. Other tokens could be registered and used as
133 needed.
134
135 They are defined as:
136 screen: a refreshable display
137 screen-paged: a refreshable display which cannot scroll
138 stationary: separately cut sheets of an opaque material
139 transparency: separately cut sheets of a transparent material
140 envelope: envelopes that can be used for conventional
141 mailing purposes
142 continuous-short: continuously connected sheets of an opaque
143 material connected along the short edge
144
145 papersize=token
146
147 For ua-media types such as stationary, it is often useful to
148 have information about the size of display used. While it is more
149 precise and predictable to use absolute resolution and pixel sizes,
150 some applications find it useful to provide paper size in lieu of
151 or in addition to this information. Paper sizes names and definitions
152 are taken from the the Printer MIB RFC [6].
153
154 Examples of paper size tokens, with names from [6], are:
155 na-letter: 8.5x11.0 inches
156 iso-A4: 210x297 mm
157 iso-B4: 250x353 mm
158 iso-A3: 297x420 mm
159 na-legal: 8.5x14 inches
160
161 color<=n
162 grey<=n
163
164 The display color capabilities are indicated with feature tag and a
165 parameter describing the number of color channel bits available.
166 Values of n are typically (but not limited to) 2, 8, or 24. For
167 example: grey=8 indicates a display capable of representing an
168 image in 256 levels of a single color, while color=8 indicates a
169 display capable of representing an image with a palette of 256
170 colors.
171
172 The `default' case, implied by absence of the tag, is color<=24.
173 In this case any palletizing and/or half-toning is done by the
174 client.
175
176 The authors recognize the issue of color model may be raised, but
177 color model can be implied or specified within image MIME types such
178 as JPEG or TIFF.
179
180 NEGOTIATION
181
182 The use of a UA-attrib feature tags should not cause a request to
183 fail. The intent is to request a preferred presentation rather than
184 a basic inability to present a resource (such as inability to handle
185 a MIME type.) Details of feature negotiation are described
186 elsewhere [5].
187
188
189 NOTATION
190
191 UA-attrib related syntax is specified here relative to the
192 definitions and rules of the HTTP specifications and to the definitions
193 of feature tags described in [5].
194
195 Feature tags
196
197 UA-attrib defines specific feature tags, pix-x, pix-y, res, UA-media
198 paged, grey, and color to be registered as feature tags for
199 transparent feature negotiation. A mechanism to register feature tags
200 has been submitted for discussion [7].These attibutes may be used
201 together or independently. The feature tags are defined as follows:
202
203
204 Form of tag Intended use
205 ---------- -----------
206 pix-x With a numeric range
207 pix-y With a numeric range
208 res With a numeric range
209 UA-media With one or more values of media
210 papersize With one or more values of paper
211 color With a numeric range
212 grey With a numeric range
213
214
215 Tokens used: values of tokens:
216 ----------- -----------------
217 media token | ("screen" | "stationery" |"transparency" |
218 "envelope" | "continuous-short" | "screen-paged")
219 paper token | ("na-letter" | "iso-a4" | "iso-b4" | "iso-a3"
220 | "na-legal")
221
222 Examples of the above feature tags:
223
224 pix-x<=1024
225 pix-y<=768
226 indicates a 1024x768 display
227
228 res<=72
229 indicates a 72 dpi display
230
231 UA-media=stationery
232 indicates the display is a cut sheet of opaque material, such as
233 paper.
234
235 papersize=iso-a4
236 indicates the display size is 210x297mm.
237
238 color<=24
239 indicates the display supports 24-bit (8-bit/channel) color.
240
241 Future work and other issues
242
243 A discussion of input device availability is ongoing. The use of
244 feature tags such as voiceinput, pointeronly or keyboardonly
245 could be used to serve interactive resources customized
246 for various clients not possessing the `normal' pointer-plus-
247 keyboard interface.
248
249 The previous draft contained both UA-pixels and UA-windowpixels
250 tags. This draft contains only one UA-pix tag, and it's use
251 (to indicate window size for an application or display size of
252 a device) is dependent on the application.
253
254 A discussion of rectangular (non-square) pixels was held. The
255 feature may be implemented by introducing an aspect-ratio tag
256 for resolution such as res-aspect, which indicates the resolution
257 ratio of the vertical direction to the horizontal direction. It
258 is unclear whether this is significant at this time.
259
260 Using numeric feature tags [5] section 7.2, it is possible for a
261 server to construct a variant list which will not provide a
262 `default' variant when the feature tag is not implemented by the
263 client. Proper construction of such variant lists requires care.
264
265 Acknowledgments
266
267 This document has benefited from the comments of Ho John Lee, Brian
268 Behlendorf, and Jeff Mogul.
269
270 References
271
272 [1] T. Berners-Lee. "Universal Resource Identifiers in WWW." A
273 Unifying Syntax for the Expression of Names and Addresses of Objects
274 on the Network as used in the World-Wide Web." RFC 1630, CERN, June
275 1994.
276
277 [2] T. Berners-Lee, L. Masinter, M. McCahill.
278 "Uniform Resource Locators (URL)." RFC 1738, CERN, Xerox PARC,
279 University of Minnesota, December 1994.
280
281 [3] T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding, H. Frystyk.
282 "Hypertext Transfer Protocol -- HTTP/1.0." RFC 1945." MIT/LCS, UC
283 Irvine, May 1996.
284
285 [4] T. Berners-Lee, R. Fielding,I J. Gettys, J. Mogul, H.
286 Frystyk. "Hypertext Transfer Protocol - HTTP/1.1" MIT/LCS,
287 UC Irvine, May 1996.
288
289 [5] K. Holtman, A. Mutz, "Transparent Content Negotiation in HTTP"
290 IETF Internet Draft draft-holtman-http-negotiation-04.txt, Nov. 1996.
291
292 [6] R. Smith, F. Wright, T. Hastings, S. Zilles, J. Gyllenskog.
293 "Printer MIB." RFC 1759." IETF, March 1995
294
295 [7] K. Holtman, A. Mutz, "Feature Tag Registration Procedures" IETF
296 Internet Draft draft-ietf-http-feature-reg-00.txt, October 1996.
297
298 Authors' Addresses
299
300 Larry Masinter
301 Xerox Palo Alto Research Center
302 3333 Coyote Hill Road
303 Palo Alto CA 94304
304 Fax +1 415 812 4333
305 Email: masinter@parc.xerox.com
306
307 Lou Montulli
308 Netscape Communications Corp.
309 501 E. Middlefield Rd.
310 Mountain View, CA 94043, USA
311 Phone +1 415 528 2600
312 Email: montulli@netscape.com
313
314 Andrew H. Mutz
315 Hewlett-Packard Company
316 1501 Page Mill Road 3U-3
317 Palo Alto CA 94304, USA
318 Fax +1 415 857 4691
319 Email: mutz@hpl.hp.com
320
321
322 Koen Holtman
323 Technische Universiteit Eindhoven
324 Postbus 513
325 Kamer HG 6.57
326 5600 MB Eindhoven (The Netherlands)
327 Email: koen@win.tue.nl
328

admin@suikawiki.org
ViewVC Help
Powered by ViewVC 1.1.24