[1] [CITE[Netscape Navigator Extensions to HTML]] [[HTML 2.0]] に対する拡張と称して、 [CODE(HTMLe)@en[[[b]]]] や [CODE(HTMLe)@en[[[i]]]] を[[入れ子]]にしても [[Netscape Navigator]] がその通りに[[レンダリング]]するようになったことを紹介しています。 [2] [SRC[>>1]] [PRE(HTML example deprecated code)[ Text here ]PRE] [3] [CITE[A Beginner's Guide to HTML]] ([CODE[2003-08-15 22:48:58 +09:00]] 版) 意外なことに > For HTML-coded documents, you should use logical styles whenever possible. Future implementations of HTML may not implement physical styles at all. なんて書いてあります。 もっとも、それでいて [CODE(HTMLe)@en[[[em]]]] と [CODE(HTMLe)@en[[[code]]]] の意味が説明されていないわけですが。 ([[名無しさん]]) [4] [CITE@en[HTML Italic and Bold Elements as regards Web Standards | The Elementary Standards]] ([[Sean Fraser]] 著, [CODE[2007-05-22 11:09:10 +09:00]] 版) ([[名無しさん]] [WEAK[2007-05-25 01:05:19 +00:00]]) [5] [CITE[EMail Msg <9212090000.AA00605@pixel.convex.com>]] ([CODE[2007-07-02 20:33:40 +09:00]] 版) [[Dan Connolly]] の、[[語句要素]]を入力するのが面倒なので [CODE(SGML)@en[[[SHORTTAG]]]] を使えるようにしませんかという提案。 ([[名無しさん]]) [6] [CITE[EMail Msg <9211301327.AA05269@pixel.convex.com>]] ([CODE[2007-07-02 21:17:14 +09:00]] 版) ([[名無しさん]]) [7] [CITE[EMail Msg <9211301327.AA05269@pixel.convex.com>]] ([CODE[2007-07-02 21:17:14 +09:00]] 版) ([[名無しさん]]) [8] [CITE[EMail Msg <9211191037.AA16353@pixel.convex.com>]] ([CODE[2007-07-02 21:23:37 +09:00]] 版) ([[名無しさん]]) [9] [CITE[EMail Msg <9212070355.AA05717@pixel.convex.com>]] ([CODE[2007-07-02 21:27:49 +09:00]] 版) ([[名無しさん]]) [10] >>9 > Yea! TeXinfo is a Good Thing, and I think it's highly appropriate that W3 support it as an authoring environment. The beauty of TeXinfo is that it's _not_ a programming language like TeX or troff. That makes it possible to develop correct translators. (Otherwise you run into the halting problem... it's everywhere!) > I studied the TeXinfo documentation for a couple hours before I released the last version of the HTML spec. The major feature of TeXinfo lacking in HTML is character-level formatting (font changes.) > There were a few TeXinfo commands (@ctrl for one) that don't fit the HTML mold. So I looked at the LaTeX options: em, tt, bd, sl, sf and the DocBook options, and nroff, and decided I didn't have time to choose the right set. ([[名無しさん]]) [11] [CITE[カナかな団首領の自転車置き場 - 物理要素とか]] ([CODE[2007-07-08 14:49:00 +09:00]] 版) ([[名無しさん]]) [12] [CITE@ja[HTML に装飾要素は必要]] ([CODE[2007-07-03 09:56:06 +09:00]] 版) ([[名無しさん]]) [13] [[HTML 5]] の中の人の意図を推測したいならせめて Design Principle くらい読んでおいて欲しいものですな。 [CITE@en-US[HTML Design Principles]] ([CODE[2007-06-27 01:27:04 +09:00]] 版) > However, structural markup is a means to an end such as media independence. Profound and detailed semantic encoding is not necessary if the end can be reached otherwise. いつの間にか一部の人から絶対的なものと妄信されるまでに至った[[表現と構造の分離]]はそもそも手段であって、 目的ではなかったのです。 ([[名無しさん]]) [14] [CITE[HTML 5のi要素とb要素、sup要素とsub要素、small要素:メモランダム]] ([CODE[2007-07-09 20:54:42 +09:00]] 版) ([[名無しさん]]) [15] [CITE[構造と見た目の分離:メモランダム]] ([TIME[2007-07-09 20:54:42 +09:00]] 版) ([[名無しさん]])